PDO Thread Lift vs Fillers: The Ultimate Guide to the Best Non‑Surgical Lift
Índice
1. What is a PDO Thread Lift, and What Is a Dermal Filler? How does each work?
2. What Is the Fundamental Goal of a PDO Thread Lift?
3. How Do Dermal Fillers Primarily Work to Rejuvenate the Face?
4. Are PDO Threads Primarily for Lifting, and Dermal Fillers for Volume?
5. How Does Each Treatment Stimulate New Collagen Production?
6. Which Procedure Offers a More Immediate “Walk‑Out” Result?
7. Is the Recovery Time Significantly Longer for PDO Threads than for Fillers?
8. Which Treatment Option Is Better for Addressing Loose, Sagging Skin (Laxity)?
9. Which Option Is More Effective for Deep Volume Loss in the Mid‑face/Cheeks?
10. For the Delicate Under‑Eye Area, Should I Choose Threads or Fillers?
11. What Is the Best Option for Achieving a Sculpted Jawline and Chin?
12. When to Choose PDO Thread Lift: Your Sagging Skin Is the Primary Concern
13. When to Choose Dermal Fillers: Your Main Concern Is Volume Loss or Wrinkles
14. Combining PDO Threads and Fillers: The Best of Both Worlds
15. Why a Professional Consultation Matters: Anatomy, Goals, and Personalized Plans
16. Preguntas más frecuentes (FAQ)
17. Conclusión
18. Referencias
1. What is a PDO Thread Lift, and What Is a Dermal Filler? How does each work?
When choosing a non‑surgical lift, you’ll often hear “PDO threads vs. dermal fillers” as the central comparison. This article discusses PDO Thread Lift vs Fillers: Choosing the Best Non-Surgical Lift.
PDO thread lifts involve inserting biodegradable polydioxanone (PDO) threads beneath the skin, anchoring them in the soft tissue, and then gently pulling the tissue upward to create a lift. Over time, these threads dissolve, but they leave behind a scaffold that stimulates the production of collagen, helping to maintain firmness.
Rellenos dérmicos, particularly those containing hyaluronic acid (HA), are gels injected into wrinkles or hollow areas to restore volume. The key difference is that threads physically lift piel flácida, while fillers occupy space to plump and smooth the skin.
The often‑stated summary in aesthetic medicine is: “PDO thread lifts are best for addressing sagging and laxity by lifting and tightening skin, while rellenos dérmicos are ideal for volume loss and deep wrinkles by adding volume.” From a procedural standpoint, fillers offer an immediate, visible change, whereas thread lifts combine an immediate lift with gradual improvement over months through collagen induction.
Many practitioners emphasize that combining both threads and fillers can produce a more harmonious and natural result than either one alone.
In the background of both approaches lies the concept of collagen stimulation procedures. PDO threads trigger a wound‑healing response that deposits new collagen around the dissolving threads.
Specific dermal fillers (e.g., biostimulatory fillers like Sculptra) also induce collagen over time, but fillers generally act faster in restoring volume.
In the conversation about “what is a PDO thread lift?”, this dual mechanism (immediate lift + extended collagen support) is what gives thread lifts their appeal in the non-surgical facelift options space.
2. What Is the Fundamental Goal of a PDO Thread Lift?
At its core, the goal of a PDO thread lift is to reposition and suspend descended tissue, counteracting early to moderate facial sagging without cutting skin or removing fat.
Because aging causes gravity, skin laxity, and loss of structural support, thread lifts aim to physically pull tissues upward in a safe and minimally invasive manner. That lifting function is what distinguishes threads from purely volumizing treatments.
A PDO thread lift also serves as an internal scaffold. As the threads are resorbed, they help maintain the lifted contour by promoting collagen formation along their path, which can help sustain the result beyond the life of the threads themselves.
In other words, the “lift” is partly mechanical and partly biological. Over time, the newly formed collagen can help reinforce the tighter architecture.
Ultimately, a key objective is to achieve a natural-looking, subtle lift with tiempo de inactividad mínimo. Because threads are inserted through minor entry points, there’s no large incision.
The aesthetic aim is not to overcorrect, but to refresh and subtly reposition the face, making it a “safe non‑surgical facelift” option when done well.
3. How Do Dermal Fillers Primarily Work to Rejuvenate the Face?
Dermal fillers, especially those containing ácido hialurónico (HA), work by adding volume and structure where it has been lost due to the aging process. As the face ages, fat pads descend or atrophy, bone retraction occurs, and soft tissues deflate.
Fillers restore volume in areas such as the cheeks, temples, tear troughs, and lips, providing plumpness and smoothing lines. Because HA attracts water, it also helps hidratación y piel turgor.
Some fillers, particularly the biostimulatory types (e.g., poly‑L‑lactic acid, calcium hydroxylapatite), go further by stimulating collagen production over months. This helps the skin gradually thicken and firm in the injected area, even after the filler has been absorbed.
But the immediate action is volumization and contour enhancement.
Injecting the right amount of filler in the correct plane can also exert a mild lifting “push” effect. By supporting deflated areas beneath sagging tissue, fillers can gently elevate the overlying skin.
However, that lifting is secondary to their core volumetric function. Thus, when you discuss “dermal filler versus threads,” the distinction is: fillers are volumetric scaffolds, threads are lifting scaffolds.
4. Are PDO Threads Primarily for Lifting, and Dermal Fillers for Volume?
Yes, in most aesthetic planning, PDO threads are primarily used as a lifting tool, while dermal fillers are employed for volume restoration.
Because threads engage soft tissue and anchor upward, they are better at addressing skin laxity, sagging jowls, and jowl descent, areas where volume alone won’t “pull” the skin. The term “thread lift vs filler cheeks” effectively captures this distinction: threads lift, fillers fill.
However, it’s essential to recognize that the division is not absolute. Some threads (especially cog or barbed threads) can generate a mild “fill effect” through their thickness, and some fillers can provide subtle lifting when placed strategically.
For instance, the decision between filler for the jawline and a thread lift for the jawline is a common point of consideration: fillers can add projection, while threads can lift sagging tissue below the jawline.
In practical decision-making, when you’re dealing with loose, sagging skin, threads often outperform fillers for lifting sagging skin. Conversely, for profound volume loss, like cheek deflation or temple hollowing, fillers are generally superior.
Where your face needs both a lift and support, the best non‑surgical lift approach might combine both.
5. How Does Each Treatment Stimulate New Collagen Production?
PDO threads act as a physical internal scaffold, triggering a controlled wound-healing response: fibroblasts migrate, collagen is deposited around the threads, and over time, the threads resorb, leaving behind a collagen “bridge” that helps maintain lift.
This is the heart of the “collagen stimulation procedure” when applied to threads. The fact that the threads dissolve slowly gives sustained stimulation over weeks to months.
Dermal fillers, especially biostimulatory ones such as Sculptra (poly‑L‑lactic acid) or Radiesse (calcium hydroxyapatite), also induce collagen deposition, though via slightly different pathways. These fillers induce mild inflammation and stimulate growth factor responses, thereby increasing fibroblast activity.
En filler volume degrades, the collagen matrix remains, helping prolong the aesthetic effect.
Even HA fillers (though primarily volumetric) can prompt small amounts of collagen reinforcement around the injected site.
The difference lies in magnitude and intent: thread lift collagen stimulation is geared toward structural support and lift, while filler-induced collagen is more supportive of volume retention and skin quality.
6. Which Procedure Offers a More Immediate “Walk-Out” Result?
Dérmico inyecciones de relleno offer a nearly instantaneous “walk-out” result: you step out of the office and can see immediate volume correction, wrinkle smoothing, or contouring. Provided there’s no severe swelling or bruising, many patients feel comfortable doing errands or even modest socializing that same day.
PDO thread lifts also produce an immediate lift; threads are tugged into place to reposition the tissue, but the full aesthetic effect typically continues to evolve over several days to a week, as swelling subsides and collagen stimulation occurs around the threads. Many providers market it as a “same-day lift with progressive improvement.”
In short, fillers are the fastest way to achieve visible change, while thread lifts also deliver an instant lift, with additional improvements over time. In terms of immediate results, fillers slightly edge out threads in speed, although threads aren’t far behind.
7. Is the Recovery Time Significantly Longer for PDO Threads than for Fillers?
Recovery for both is relatively minimal compared to surgical options; however, PDO threads tend to require a slightly more cautious post-procedure period than fillers. After a filler session, many patients resume everyday life almost immediately or within 24 hours, aside from minor bruising or swelling.
With threads, you may experience more noticeable swelling, bruising, or soreness for a few days. Providers often advise avoiding strenuous exercise, masajes faciales, and sleeping on your side for a week or more to prevent thread displacement.
Some report returning to regular activities in 1–2 days, but complete “settling” may take 5–7 days.
Thus, while filler recovery is more forgiving, thread lifts do come with slightly stricter activity limitations during the early healing phase. In terms of thread lift recovery time vs filler, threads generally demand a marginally longer, more cautious recovery stage.
8. Which Treatment Option Is Better for Addressing Loose, Sagging Skin (Laxity)?
When your primary concern is loose, sagging skin (especially in the jowls, neck, and lower face), PDO threads are often the superior choice.
Porque threads anchor into deeper tissue planes and act as lifting devices, they can mechanically reposition sagging tissue upward. They are one of the better non-surgical options for jowl treatment.
Fillers help a little: by filling underneath, sometimes they can “buttress” sagging areas and provide mild lift through internal support. But fillers alone are rarely sufficient when laxity is moderate to severe.
In such cases, debates between thread lift and filler cheeks often favor threads for correcting sagging skin. Some clinicians will augment threads with fillers to support residual areas of volume loss.
So, for lifting sagging skin, threads are generally more effective. When sagging is minimal, or if volume loss dominates, fillers may suffice, or combining both may be optimal.
9. Which Option Is More Effective for Deep Volume Loss in the Mid‑face / Cheeks?
For profound volume loss, such as hollowed cheeks, temple depressions, or flattening of the midface, dermal fillers are almost always the more effective first-line approach.
Fillers can precisely restore lost volume, sculpt contours, and smooth transitions. Hyaluronic acid and biostimulatory fillers are well-suited for this purpose.
PDO threads have limited capacity to restore deep volume: their lifting effect is not the same as replacing volumetric deficit. In many cases, threads can lift sagging tissue overlying a hollowed cheek, but won’t fully correct a volume void.
Thus, when midface volume loss is a significant concern, choosing a filler is often the wiser option.
That said, a combination approach, lifting with threads and then filling in residual hollows, often yields the most natural and harmonized result. That is especially applicable in older patients who have both sagging and volume depletion.
10. For the Delicate Under‑Eye Area, Should I Choose Threads or Fillers?
The under-eye (tear trough) area is one of the most delicate, with piel fina and a high risk of complications.
In most cases, fillers are preferred for the under-eye region, mainly when carefully placed rellenos de ácido hialurónico, because volume loss is often the primary issue (tear trough hollowing). Fillers can subtly lift the lid-cheek junction and smooth transitions.
PDO threads under the eyes are trickier: the thinness of the tissue, risk of visible threads, dimpling, or thread migration makes this zone a higher risk. Some providers avoid threads in the suborbital region altogether or use only wonderful, smooth threads.
In comparisons of PDO threads under the eyes, many patients find fillers safer and more predictable.
However, for mild laxity in the lower eyelid-cheek junction zone, an advanced practitioner might combine very delicate threads plus filler. But as a general rule, filler is safer in the under-eye area.
11. What Is the Best Option for Achieving a Sculpted Jawline and Chin?
When sculpting the jawline and chin, both modalities have roles, and the best approach depends on your anatomy and goals.
PDO threads for jawline lift are effective at lifting sagging jowls and tightening the lower facial border (i.e., non-surgical facelift of the lower face). Threads can help define the jaw angle by pulling up soft tissue.
On the other hand, deciding between fillers for the jawline and a thread lift is a frequent decision. Fillers can build projection in the chin or along the jawline to enhance definition.
If your jawline lacks volume or projection, filler may produce the structural support that threads alone can’t supply. Some practitioners place filler first to create a structural scaffold, then use threads to lift residual sagging around it.
In many cases, a hybrid approach (filling the jaw or chin and threading the adjacent jowl tissues) yields the sharpest, most natural contour. But if sagging is mild and your jaw definition is decent, threads alone might suffice for a subtle lift.
12. When to Choose PDO Thread Lift: Your Sagging Skin Is the Primary Concern
Consider a PDO thread lift when skin laxity or sagging is your primary concern, rather than volume loss.
If you see jowls forming, cheeks descending, nasolabial folds deepening due to descent rather than volume loss, threads can reposition tissue upward. This matches your “choose PDO Thread Lift” scenario.
Another scenario is when you want a subtle, natural lift but don’t want to risk an overfilled look with fillers. Threads provide a “structural lift” without adding bulk.
If you already have sufficient volume but need tightening, threads may be a safer option. Also, if filler options have been exhausted or you want long‑term collagen stimulation, threads can complement existing work.
In summary: choose PDO threads if your primary concern is lifting and tightening loose skin, rather than just filling in hollows or wrinkles.
13. When to Choose Dermal Fillers: Your Main Concern Is Volume Loss or Wrinkles
Si su face appears flat, sunken, or hollow, especially in the cheeks, temples, under-eye area, or nasolabial zones, then dermal fillers are often your first choice. When volume loss is the dominant problem, fillers restore fullness in a way that threads can’t.
If you have deep lines or folds (e.g., nasolabial folds, marionette lines) without significant sagging, fillers can effectively smooth those transitions. Fillers are also valuable for enhancing features (lips, chin, cheeks) with artistic precision.
Thus, choose fillers when your main issues are volume loss or arrugas profundas, not just sagging. And when filler use is maximized, threads may be used to complement the results and add lift.
14. Combining PDO Threads and Fillers: The Best of Both Worlds
Many expert practitioners advocate combining threads and fillers in a layered, plan personalizado to address both laxity and volume loss.
Threads reposition sagging tissues, while fillers restore missing volume and smooth transitions. The synergy often yields a more natural, harmonious, and long-lasting result than either alone.
For example, a patient with saggy cheeks and hollow under-eyes might receive threads to lift the cheek plane and jowls, and then HA filler in the tear troughs and midface to restore contour. Careful timing is crucial: some clinicians place threads first, then fillers after a few weeks, once the swelling has settled.
When planning a combined approach, it’s crucial to respect tissue planes, avoid overcorrection, and select safe dosing. The combined method is often the “best non‑surgical facelift option” for many patients, especially those with multiple aging concerns.
15. Why a Professional Consultation Matters: Anatomy, Goals, and Personalized Plans
No one-size-fits-all solution exists in PDO thread lifts versus fillers.
A professional consultation is crucial because your skin quality, bone structure, soft tissue thickness, degree of sagging, and aesthetic goals all influence the ideal plan. What works for one face may overcorrect or underperform on another.
A skilled injector or surgeon evaluates which treatment or combination is safer and more effective, taking into account your unique anatomy and medical history. For example, thin or sun-damaged skin may be more prone to visible threads; severe volume loss might demand filler first.
The provider also queries your health status, downtime tolerance, and budget.
Ultimately, the best choice, thread, filler, or both, depends on a customized plan. A practitioner will assess which non‑surgical facelift options yield the most natural, long-lasting result for your unique face.
16. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about PDO Thread Lift vs Fillers: Choosing the Best Non-Surgical Lift
Q1. What is better, PDO threads or fillers?
Respuesta concisa: It depends on your needs; threads are better for lifting, whereas fillers are better for volume, and often a combination is ideal.
Respuesta detallada: Whether PDO threads or fillers are “better” hinges on your facial concerns. If sagging and laxity are your primary concerns, threads may provide the necessary support for lifting.
If hollowness or deep folds dominate, fillers excel. In many real-world cases, combining threads and fillers yields the most balanced and natural outcome by addressing both descent and volume loss.
Q2. Why do plastic surgeons hate PDO threads?
Respuesta concisa: Surgeons don’t universally “hate” PDO threads, but some criticize them due to short-lived results, potential complications, and marketing exaggerations.
Respuesta detallada: Some plastic surgeons are skeptical about PDO threads because the results are more subtle and temporary than those of surgical lifts, and complications such as dimpling, thread migration, or scarring can occur, especially in the hands of unskilled practitioners.
Also, aggressive marketing may overpromise a “facelift in a day,” which can lead to disappointment. That said, many experienced surgeons use threads judiciously as part of their non‑surgical armamentarium.
Q3. Do the Kardashians get thread lifts?
Respuesta concisa: There is anecdotal evidence that some celebrities use thread lifts, though public confirmation is rare.
Respuesta detallada: While speculative, many believe that high-profile people (like the Kardashians) may use minimally invasive rejuvenation techniques, including fillers, Botox, and possibly thread lifts. But despite rumors, few openly admit to thread lifts, so it remains in the realm of aesthetic gossip.
The takeaway: Thread lifts are less invasive and more discreet, attributes that make them well-suited for celebrity use.
Q4. What’s better than PDO threads?
Respuesta concisa: “Better than PDO threads” may refer to surgical facelifts or longer‑lasting technologies like SMAS lifts or deep plane lifts.
Respuesta detallada: If your sagging is advanced, a surgical facelift may outperform PDO threads in durability and dramatic effect. In the non‑surgical realm, newer “lifting” technologies (e.g., silhouette threads, resorbable biostimulatory suspensions) may offer more enduring lift.
However, “better” is determined by indications: threads are effective in mild to moderate cases, but they’re not a wholesale substitute for surgery in severe cases of aging.
Q5. Can PDO Threads be used to lift the eyebrows, or are fillers a better option?
Respuesta concisa: Yes, PDO threads can lift the eyebrows, though fillers may be safer or more predictable depending on your anatomy.
Respuesta detallada: For eyebrow elevation, barbed or cog threads can be strategically placed above the brow to support lift. However, due to the delicate anatomy and piel fina, some practitioners prefer microcannula filler lifts in the brow arch or glue-like adhesive lifts before threads.
The choice depends on how much lift you need, your skin thickness, and the risk tolerance for thread-related complications in that area.
Q6. How do these options perform when treating lines around the mouth (marionette/nasolabial)?
Respuesta concisa: Lines around the mouth (nasolabial/marionette) often respond better to fillers, though threads may help in adjunct.
Respuesta detallada: Dermal fillers, mainly HA fillers, are commonly used to soften nasolabial folds and marionette lines by restoring volume in adjacent areas like cheeks and pre‑jowl sulcus.
Threads may provide an upward pull to counter sagging skin around the corners of the mouth, but they rarely suffice alone for deep folds. Hence, many clinicians combine threads to lift and fillers to smooth.
Q7. Which is recommended for improving the appearance of a sagging neck?
Respuesta concisa: For a sagging neck, threads are more suitable; fillers have a limited role there.
Respuesta detallada: Neck laxity, also known as “turkey neck,” typically involves sagging skin more than volume loss. PDO threads (also referred to as neck/platysma threads) can help lift and tighten the neck area.
Fillers in the neck are less effective and can lead to unwanted bulging. For more severe neck sagging, surgical platysmaplasty may still be required.
Q8. What are the common side effects and risks of a PDO Thread Lift?
Respuesta concisa: Common side effects of a PDO thread lift include swelling, bruising, dimpling, infection, and thread visibility.
Respuesta detallada: Studies report complications such as edema (≈ approximately 35%), skin dimpling (≈ approximately 10%), transient paresthesia, thread visibility or extrusion, and infection in a small fraction of cases.
More serious events, such as asymmetry or scarring, are rare but possible, especially when improper technique or placement is used.
Q9. When is a combination treatment of both threads and fillers recommended?
Respuesta concisa: A combination treatment is recommended when you have both sagging and volume loss in the same facial area.
Respuesta detallada: When your face shows both descent (looseness, jowls) and deflation (hollow cheeks, sunken temples), threads alone may not restore lost fullness, and fillers alone may inadequately lift.
In such cases, combining thread lift (for lift) and filler (for volume) yields a more comprehensive rejuvenation, blending structural support with contour enhancement.
Q10. When should a patient choose a surgical facelift over threads or fillers?
Respuesta concisa: Choose a surgical facelift over threads or fillers when skin laxity is severe or structural repositioning is needed.
Respuesta detallada: A surgical facelift is preferred when sagging is advanced, when significant repositioning of underlying tissues is required, or when you desire long-lasting results for many years.
Non-surgical options, such as threads or fillers, excel in mild to moderate aging but are limited when excess skin, deep descent, or structural deficits predominate.
Q11. How painful is a PDO Thread Lift compared to Dermal Filler injections?
Respuesta concisa: A PDO thread lift can be more painful than filler injections, though local anesthesia usually makes both tolerable.
Respuesta detallada: Injecting fillers is usually quick and causes minimal discomfort (often numbed with a topical or local anesthetic). Thread insertion involves more mechanical manipulation, tugging, and sometimes passage through multiple planes; this can be more uncomfortable.
But practitioners often use nerve blocks + local anesthetics to keep it tolerable. The pain level difference depends heavily on provider skill, thread type, and anesthesia method.
Q12. My cheek fillers look great, but I still have jowls. Should I get threads?
Respuesta concisa: Yes, if your cheek fillers look good but you still have jowls, adding threads may help lift the sagging jawline.
Respuesta detallada: Cheek fillers restore volume higher up, but they may not address descent in the lower face. If you still have jowls after filler, PDO threads can help lift the soft tissue that descends downward from the cheek.
That is a common scenario: fill the midface, then thread the lower face to achieve a harmonious result.
Q13. How much bruising/swelling should I actually expect from PDO threads?
Respuesta concisa: You can expect moderate bruising and swelling after receiving PDO threads, which typically lasts 3–7 days.
Respuesta detallada: Bruising and swelling are common side effects of thread lifts; minor swelling may last up to a week, and bruising can persist 3–5 days or more, depending on vascular sensitivity.
Avoiding blood thinners and following post-care instructions (such as applying ice and gentle care) helps minimize this. Some mild discomfort or tightness is also typical.
Q14. Is it true that threads can lift the skin but don’t help with deep wrinkles?
Respuesta concisa: It is partially true: threads primarily lift and are less effective for deep wrinkles, so some wrinkle correction requires fillers.
Respuesta detallada: Threads excel at repositioning tissue but don’t “fill in” deep folds, such as marionette or nasolabial lines. While the lift may reducir la aparición de arrugas, deeper lines often remain and require filler or other soft tissue volumetric treatments.
Thus, threads can assist, but they’re rarely enough alone for deep wrinkles.
Q15. I’m worried about the “overfilled” look. Which treatment is safer for a natural result?
Respuesta concisa: For a natural result with low risk of “overfilled” look, a conservative, combination approach with moderate threads + filler is usually safest.
Respuesta detallada: The “overfilled” look often comes from excessive filler volume in one area. Threads don’t add bulk; they reposition, so the risk of overfill is lower.
That said, poorly placed threads can cause puckering or dimpling. A credible provider who balances lift and volume, treats conservatively, and stages procedures carefully is the best guarantee of a natural, elegant outcome.
17. Conclusion: PDO Thread Lift vs Fillers: Choosing the Best Non-Surgical Lift
Choosing between a PDO thread lift and filler is not a clear-cut “one is better than the other” decision; it’s about identifying your aging pattern and matching the treatment to your anatomy and goals.
Threads excel when sagging and laxity are primary concerns; fillers are most effective where volume loss or deep wrinkles are the predominant concerns. However, because aging almost always combines descent and deflation, the most effective strategy often lies in a hybrid approach that leverages both.
While PDO threads provide a structural “lift” and stimulate collagen over time, dermal fillers deliver immediate volume and contour. The optimal non‑surgical lift balances these forces carefully.
The art lies not in overcorrecting but in achieving subtle elevation, restoring youthful volume, and preserving your natural facial harmony. En cost per thread or filler unit should never override the need for proper placement, proportion, and safety.
A skilled, experienced injector or surgeon is your key partner.
Only through a tailored consultation, considering your skin quality, degree of sagging, bony support, and expectations, can the best non-surgical facelift plan be developed.
We have covered everything about PDO Thread Lift vs Fillers: Choosing the Best Non-Surgical Lift.
Transforme su belleza en Plantation Med Spa, Florida
Experimente los tratamientos médicos de spa con los mejores tratamientos médicos de spa y consejos en Plantation Med SpaFlorida. Nuestra moderna el tratamiento revitaliza y rejuvenecey le ofrece un camino hacia una piel radiante y joven. A qué esperas para dar lo mejor de ti?
Llámenos ahora al (954) 595-2607 o reserve online. Su viaje hacia la perfección piel comienza con un simple clic o una llamada.
Abrazar la bellezaAbrazar la innovación - Abrazarte a ti.
18. Referencias
Clínica de West Palm Beach IV Therapy
A New Complex Minimally Invasive Thread Lift Method for One‑Time Three‑Step Thread Facelift
Fuente: Authors, published via PMC / NCBI
Resumen: This prospective study of 357 patients aged 32–67 years evaluated a novel three-step thread lift method over a follow-up period of up to 2 years. Results showed high satisfaction, measurable lift based on wrinkle and aesthetic scales, and acceptable safety.
Fuente: PMC / NCBI
Resumen: This review discusses the rationale and outcomes of combining HA fillers, suspension threads, and botulinum toxin in facial rejuvenation. It addresses how each modality contributes (in terms of volume, lift, and smoothing) and examines the synergy and limitations of these modalities.
Outcomes in Thread Lift for Facial Rejuvenation: a Study Performed over 2 Years
Fuente: PMC / NCBI
Resumen: In 37 patients undergoing a barbed suture/thread lift (Happy Lift system), the study tracked efficacy and complications over 24 months. It provides data on longevity, recurrence, and safety metrics.
Fuente: PubMed / NCBI
Resumen: This smaller study, involving 10 patients, utilized ultrasound and photography over 120 days to assess changes in the dermis, subcutaneous, and hypodermis layers following the insertion of PDO threads. It showed increased dermal thickness and collagen formation around threads.
Thread Lifting of the Jawline: A Pilot Study for Quantitative Evaluation
Fuente: PMC / NCBI
Resumen: Using polylactic / polycaprolactone “suspension” threads, the authors measured changes in facial metrics (like tragus‑to-jowl distance) over ~8 months. They found statistically significant improvements and concluded that the method is safe and effective for mild to moderate jawline ptosis.
Fuente: ASJ Open Forum (Oxford Academic)
Resumen: This randomized study compared the use of 3 versus 6 PDO threads per hemiface in 22 patients. It measured volumetric changes and tissue displacement at 20 and 60 days, finding that the number of threads did not significantly improve sustained lift or patient satisfaction.
Fuente: PMC / NCBI
Resumen: This prospective, masked trial assessed the combination of hyaluronic acid fillers plus PDO threads over 1–2 years, showing that combining the treatments maintained improvements in facial volume and contour longer than either alone.
Fuente: PMC / NCBI
Resumen: In 58 participants, the study combined barbed threads with HIFU in the mid/lower face. It reported statistically significant improvements in aesthetic scores and jowl fat pad distance across treatment sessions, indicating synergistic effects.
Evolution of Thread Lifting: Advancing Toward Bioactive Thread Designs
Fuente: MDPI (Open Access Journal)
Resumen: This review examines the evolution of thread-lifting techniques and materials, with a focus on how newer bioactive threads aim not only to lift but also stimulate collagen and enhance skin quality through microtrauma and structural scaffolding.
Fuente: PMC / NCBI
Resumen: Drawing on 160 patient studies, this review examines barbed suture facelifts (especially dissolvable threads like PDO), focusing on the duration of effects, rates of complications, and patterns of fade over time.
